Was the punishment for the Minnesota woman who downloaded music illegally too harsh? - richest person in minnesota
A Minnesota woman with 4 children, was found by a jury, convicted and fined $ 1.9 million. If you do not know history, you can Google and find out. Do you think his punishment was fair?
My opinion: I do not think it was easy, because there are millions of Americans have illegally downloaded music will not be punished. If it has to pay $ 1.9 million, while the rate must be for all those who are not uniform. In addition, if the sentence was in a way that a precedent to dissuade the Americans downloading music, set, why not bust a rich person could apply? What they did to this woman destroys any possibility to continue their support for her four children. Would not surprise me that kills his children and committed suicide because they can no longer afford to care for their children. I am not defending the woman for what she did, but the punishment was too harsh. His life should not be destroyed because download 19 songs. In fact, I saw the message and there is a man who killed a man with aArms and all he got was 10 years on probation. The judiciary is not fair at all.
But is America, I know that most people will agree with the punishment (and some say it takes more punishment) and that this country wants the punishment to be unjust.
His opinion now. His punishment is fair?
Just think: if I were you, you think that do pay only 1.9 million U.S. dollars for downloading 19 songs at?
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Richest Person In Minnesota Was The Punishment For The Minnesota Woman Who Downloaded Music Illegally Too Harsh?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
The music industry has offered to meet with her between 3k and 5k at it, they refused and thought he would win before a jury.
This is his second attempt.
How is it unfair? If it is not clear, would have done. And for a fraction of what the jury the RIAA.
It was not a "punishment" because it is not a criminal case. He was a civil action and the music companies are compensated for their losses. The jury determined damages.
Everyone, that your punishment is too severe.
It's not like everyone in the world that do it illegally, what he did. She just thought, how about all the criminals in the figure, it does not fall, because others do the same thing.
His statement that "this country wants to give the unjust punishment" denies all logic, which seeks to make its case.
For a first offense, I think it's ridiculous exaggeration. I have read, not the story, so do not know if it was a record year. The thing is, if the law a fine of 100 major nuisance for everyone, so the price you pay is payable. I'm sure he knew what he was doing was illegal. She had to be careful to examine the consequences or not think would be caught, too. I just hope that some of these famous musicians, who will not believe in the continuation of this help from this jam. People do not get to freakin '.
For a first offense, I think it's ridiculous exaggeration. I have read, not the story, so do not know if it was a record year. The thing is, if the law a fine of 100 major nuisance for everyone, so the price you pay is payable. I'm sure he knew what he was doing was illegal. She had to be careful to examine the consequences or not think would be caught, too. I just hope that some of these famous musicians, who will not believe in the continuation of this help from this jam. People do not get to freakin '.
For a first offense, I think it's ridiculous exaggeration. I have read, not the story, so do not know if it was a record year. The thing is, if the law a fine of 100 major nuisance for everyone, so the price you pay is payable. I'm sure he knew what he was doing was illegal. She had to be careful to examine the consequences or not think would be caught, too. I just hope that some of these famous musicians, who will not believe in the continuation of this help from this jam. People do not get to freakin '.
The music industry has offered to meet with her between 3k and 5k at it, they refused and thought he would win before a jury.
This is his second attempt.
How is it unfair? If it is not clear, would have done. And for a fraction of what the jury the RIAA.
At the same time, there are those in the cases of persons who want to limit permanently disabled by medical negligence. are far, far less.
I think we have things out of proportion in this country.
At the same time, there are those in the cases of persons who want to limit permanently disabled by medical negligence. are far, far less.
I think we have things out of proportion in this country.
Post a Comment